MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296798614

Machine learning algorithms for geometry processing by example

2010· dissertation· en· W2296798614 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron Hertzmann, Karan Singh, Evangelos Kalogerakis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationArtificial intelligenceRendering (computer graphics)Computer scienceShape analysis (program analysis)AlgorithmPolygon meshPoint distribution modelActive shape modelGeometry processingComputer visionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)GeometryMathematicsComputer graphics (images)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis proposes machine learning algorithms for processing geometry by example. Each algorithm takes as input a collection of shapes along with exemplar values of target properties related to shape processing tasks. The goal of the algorithms is to output a function that maps from the shape data to the target properties. The learned functions can be applied to novel input shape data in order to synthesize the target properties with style similar to the training examples. Learning such functions is particularly useful for two different types of geometry processing problems. The first type of problems involves learning functions that map to target properties required for shape interpretation and understanding. The second type of problems involves learning functions that map to geometric attributes of animated shapes required for real-time rendering of dynamic scenes. With respect to the first type of problems involving shape interpretation and understanding, I demonstrate learning for shape segmentation and line illustration. For shape segmentation, the algorithms learn functions of shape data in order to perform segmentation and recognition of parts in 3D meshes simultaneously. This is in contrast to existing mesh segmentation methods that attempt segmentation without recognition based only on low-level geometric cues. The proposed method does not require any manual parameter tuning and achieves significant improvements in results over the state-of-the-art. For line illustration, the algorithms learn functions from shape and shading data to hatching properties, given a single exemplar line illustration of a shape. Learning models of such artistic-based properties is extremely challenging, since hatching exhibits significant complexity as a network of overlapping curves of varying orientation, thickness, density, as well as considerable stylistic variation. In contrast to existing algorithms that are hand-tuned or hand-designed from insight and intuition, the proposed technique offers a largely automated and potentially natural workflow for artists. With respect to the second type of problems involving fast computations of geometric attributes in dynamic scenes, I demonstrate algorithms for learning functions of shape animation parameters that specifically aim at taking advantage of the spatial and temporal coherence in the attribute data. As a result, the learned mappings can be evaluated very efficiently during runtime. This is especially useful when traditional geometric computations are too expensive to re-estimate the shape attributes at each frame. I apply such algorithms to efficiently compute curvature and high-order derivatives of animated surfaces. As a result, curvature-dependent tasks, such as line drawing, which could be previously performed only offline for animated scenes, can now be executed in real-time on modern CPU hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207