MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2297040241 · doi:10.14288/1.0085307

Some aspects of the oceanographic structure in the Jervis Inlet system

2011· article· en· W2297040241 on OpenAlexaff
J. R. Lazier

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInletOceanographyGeographyGeologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variations in the distributions of temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen content in the water in the Jervis system of inlets, between July 1961 and March 1963, have been examined in order to ascertain net current patterns and interactions between the inlets. The depths of the entrance sills divide the inlets into two groups. Of the four inlets in the system three possess shallow sills which force the tide water to enter the inlets in a turbulent jet. The circulation pattern resulting from the influence of this jet on the inlet is proposed. In contrast, the sill of the largest inlet in the system (Jervis) is deep and the tidal flow does not destroy the vertical stratification in the inlet to any appreciable degree. The relatively small fresh water runoff into Jervis creates a weak estuarine circulation resulting in slow renewal of the intermediate and deep water. The low oxygen concentrations found at mid-depths near the head of Jervis are attributed to this abnormally slow renewal. A mid-depth oscillatory flow of unknown period was found during the winter of 1962-63 in Jervis Inlet. This flow is attributed to strong south-westerly winds which raise the water level in Jervis Inlet forcing a mid-depth outflow. The direction of this flow possesses a negative correlation with the depth of the surface layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.126
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207