ICEBERG RISK TO SEABED INSTALLATIONS ON THE GRAND BANKS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nine icebergs were reported to have grounded on the northeastern Grand Banks during the year 2000 ice season. Documentation of possible groundings provides a basis for planning seabed scour surveys and thus the ability to study the degradation of scours over time,knowing the exact date of scour creation. All available data for the nine reported grounding events were examined and are summarized in this paper. These data include photographs,iceberg principal dimensions, iceberg drift tracks, seabed bathymetry, winds, currents, ice management tow force and direction and comments made by crew and ice observers. The datawere then used to prioritize each of the events for the likelihood of finding a scour mark during field surveys.The prioritization was based on five criteria: event duration, local bathymetry, environmental driving forces, crew and observer comments and presence of older, previously measured scours in the area. Modelling of the scour process was conducted in an attempt to estimate scour length and depth for each event. These modelling efforts were \ncompleted in an attempt to help validate the scour model, as well as to provide furtherinformation on the likelihood of locating reported scours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".