MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2297912008

The role of the GABAergic system in the production of ultrasonic vocalization in rats

2000· dissertation· en· W2297912008 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nancy A. SanCartier

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUltrasonic sensorGABAergicProduction (economics)NeuroscienceCommunicationAcousticsBiologyPsychologyPhysicsInhibitory postsynaptic potential
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasonic vocalization plays an important role in intraspecies communication for rats. It
\nhas been well demonstrated that rats will emit 22kHz vocalization in stressfiil or
\nthreatening situations. Although the neural mechanism underlying vocahzation is not
\nwell understood, it is known that chohnergic input to the basal forebrain induces such
\nalarm calls. A number of experiments have found that intracerebral injection of
\ncarbachol, a predominantly muscarinic agonist, into die anterior hypothalamic/preoptic
\narea (AH/POA) rehably induces vocalization similar to naturally emitted ultrasonic calls.
\nIt has also been shown that carbachol has extensive inhibitory effects on neuronal firing
\nin the same area. This result impUes that the inhibitory effects of carbachol in the
\nAH/POA could trigger vocahzation, and that the GABAergic system could be involved.
\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects ofGABA agonists and antagonists
\non flie production of carbachol induced 22kHz vocalization. The following hypotheses
\nwere examined: 1) apphcation ofGABA (a naturally occurring inhibitory
\nneurotransmitter) will have a synergistic effect with carbachol, increasing vocalization;
\nand 2) tiie apphcation ofGABA antagonists (picrotoxin or bicuculline) will reduce
\ncaibachol-induced vocalization. A total of sixty rats were implanted with stainless steel
\nguide cannulae in the AH/POA area. After recovery, animals were locally pretreated with
\n1) GABA (l-40ng), 2) picrotoxin (1 .5^g) or bicuculhne (0.03ng), or 3) sahne; before
\ninjection with carbachol (1 .5^g). The resulting vocalization was measured and
\nquantitated. The results indicate that pretreatment with GABA or GABA antagonists had
\nno significant effect on vocalization. Local pretreatment with GABA did not potentiate
\nthe vocal response as measured by its duration, latraicy, and total number of calls.
\nSimilarly, pretreatment with picrotoxin or bicuculline had no effects on the same
\nmeasures of vocalization. The results suggest tfiat chohnoceptive neurons involved in the
\nproduction of alarm calls are not under direct GABAergic control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)Same topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207