Self-Assembled Gyroidal Mesoporous Polymer-Derived High Temperature Ceramic Monoliths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs) have enabled the development of nonoxide ceramic coatings and fibers with exceptional thermo-mechanical stability. Here, we report the self-assembly based synthesis of gyroidal (space group Q 230, Ia 3̅ d ) mesoporous silicon oxynitride ceramic monoliths by pyrolysis of blends of commercially available preceramic polysilazane with a structure-directing triblock terpolymer up to temperatures of 1000 °C. Monoliths had pore diameters of 9.4 ± 1.1 nm and surface area of 160 m 2 /g. The three-dimensionally (3D) ordered periodic pore structure of the as-made hybrids acts to relieve stresses by allowing the escape of gases formed during ceramization. This process in turn enables the retention of smooth monoliths during ceramization under ammonia, a process that both adds nitrogen to the material and removes carbon pyrolysis products. The monoliths are appealing for high-temperature applications such as catalyst supports and microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices including gas and pressure sensors, as well as strong, stiff, and creep-resistant scaffolds for ordered interpenetrating phase composites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".