MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2298519416 · doi:10.1159/000443405

Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor Diagnosis after Partial Resection of Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumor: Case Report and Review of the Literature

2016· review· en· W2298519416 on OpenAlexaff
Mustafa Nadi, Tahani Ahmad, Annie Huang, Cynthia Hawkins, Éric Bouffet, Abhaya V. Kulkarni

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDebulkingMalignant transformationRadiation therapyLesionAtypical teratoid rhabdoid tumorBrain tumorPathologyRadiologyCancerImmunohistochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNETs) are generally considered benign, slow-growing epilepsy-associated lesions. While rare cases of malignant transformation of DNET to high-grade glial tumors have been reported, to our knowledge there have been no reports of transformation/emergence of DNET to atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT), a highly aggressive embryonal brain tumor. Here, we report the case of an 8-year-old boy who presented with an incidental finding of a small right insular lesion which grew slowly over 3 years. The patient first underwent surgery with subtotal tumor resection at age 11. Pathology was consistent with DNET. Following surgery, further tumor growth was evident, requiring fractionated radiotherapy and eventually chemotherapy, but continued tumor growth was witnessed. Three years after radiation, imaging showed dramatic further tumor growth, and the patient underwent a second debulking surgery. The pathology revealed a malignant tumor with BAF47-negative cells, suggestive of AT/RT. This report adds to our knowledge about the poorly understood behavior and natural history of DNETs and emphasizes the importance of lifelong clinical and neuroimaging follow-up of these lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurosurgerySame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207