MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2298735086 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv133.559

Comparative Effectiveness of Cloxacillin or Cefazolin Versus Vancomycin as Empiric Therapy in Patients With Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia

2015· article· en· W2298735086 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Davie Wong, Titus Wong, Marc G. Romney, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloxacillinMedicineCefazolinVancomycinBacteremiaEmpiric therapyStaphylococcus aureusMicrobiologyStaphylococcal infectionsAntibioticsPenicillinBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Prior studies suggested that vancomycin (VA) may be inferior to β-lactams (BL) for empiric treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed if empiric therapy with cloxacillin or cefazolin compared to VA was associated with improved survival and microbiological cure in patients with MSSA bloodstream infection. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients with their first episode of monomicrobial MSSA bacteremia at two tertiary care hospitals in Vancouver, Canada between 2007 and 2014. Exposure was either empiric BL or VA therapy. Definitive therapy with cloxacillin or cefazolin was started within 72 hours after the first positive blood culture. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, duration of bacteremia and hospital length-of-stay (LOS). Multivariate analysis was adjusted for age, gender, Charlson-comorbidity index, Pitt bacteremia score, infectious diseases consultation, infective endocarditis (IE) and time to receipt of empirical antibiotics. Results. Of 669 patients identified, 255 met inclusion criteria (β-lactam = 131, vancomycin = 124). The overall 28-day mortality was 7.06% (n = 18). IE was diagnosed in 14.1% (n = 36) of cases. The median duration of empiric and definitive therapy was 2.1 days and 4 weeks, respectively. Adjusted mortality at 28 days was similar between the BL and VA groups (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.29-3.63). The duration of bacteremia was longer in the VA group compared to the BL group (97.1 versus 70.7 hours, p = 0.007). There was no difference in mortality at 90 days (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.40-2.60) and hospital LOS (19 versus 22.5 days, p = 0.11). Transition to cloxacillin or cefazolin occurred within a median of 68.3 hours from the first positive blood culture in the vancomycin group. Conclusion. Empiric therapy with cloxacillin or cefazolin was associated with earlier clearance of bacteremia by a median of 1 day compared to VA, but was not associated with lower all-cause mortality. VA monotherapy is adequate for the empirical treatment of MSSA bloodstream infections as long as definitive therapy can be initiated within 3 days from the onset of bacteremia. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207