MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2298917610 · doi:10.20361/g2wg6t

The Fathomless Fire by T. Wharton

2012· article· en· W2298917610 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Lissa Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Deakin Review of Children s Literature · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmMAGIC (telescope)Shadow (psychology)FantasyNarrativeWizardLiteratureKnightHistoryArtPlot (graphics)RomanceArt historyArchaeologyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wharton, Thomas. The Fathomless Fire. Toronto: Doubleday Canada, 2012. Print. The Fathomless Fire is a sequel to Wharton’s first fantasy novel, The Shadow of Malabron. In Shadow, we met Will Lightfoot, an angry young teen catapulted into the magical world of the Perilous Realm. This land consists of all the characters and plot conventions of the fairy and folk tales of our world. They have been deftly altered to place them in a realistic medieval setting, with a few twists. Stories are the key to the magic of the Realm, and the power of the land is in the hands of those who understand these stories. There, Will meets Rowen and her grandfather, the Loremaster. The Perilous Realm is under siege by Malabron, the Dark Lord, who wishes to end all stories but his own, bringing the land into shadow. Sound familiar? It should, as Wharton has brought all of the traditional archetypes and elements of fantasy to bear in these tales: Troubled young protagonist, the dark lord, the wise wizard, the knight, and the companions who are assembled for the quest, to assist the protagonist in his fight against the evil in a medieval setting. Wharton has used these conventions to his own advantage here, creating a rich and detailed world. Shadow of Malabron ended with Rowen discovering that she is the new Loremaster, and Will’s return to our world. The Fathomless Fire begins with Will discovering that his friends need his help, so he revisits the Realm. This time, the narrative is divided between Will and Rowen’s separate storylines. Will is off to find his friend Shade, a talking wolf who was his closest companion. Rowen is in the town of Fable, working with her grandfather to develop her skills as a Loremaster. Of course, neither journey is as easy as it seems, and both Will and Rowen must be flexible to follow the twists and turns of their fates. Wharton has obviously done his homework. He has built a vibrant and interesting world, full of detail and character. However, it appears that Wharton, in his eagerness to introduce as many recognizable stories from our world, misses opportunities to flesh out situations which would allow the reader to fully experience his world. Characters remain blocky, lacking the in-depth characterization which would deepen our connection to them. While the multiplicity of story threads Wharton has woven throughout this book may be overwhelming for some younger readers, those with a good understanding of the fantasy genre will be drawn to this series. Wharton is an accomplished writer, and his language and descriptive passages draws the reader into the Perilous Realm and the journeys of Will and Rowen. I recommend reading Shadow of Malabron first, to become familiar with the Realm, before embarking on this second novel. Readers who are looking for a new high fantasy novel, but who are not quite ready for The Lord of the Rings will find this tale intriguing and enjoyable. Recommended: 3 out of 4 stars Reviewer: Lissa Davies Lissa Davies is an elementary teacher-librarian in Edmonton. She is a passionate reader, and is always excited to share new books and engage readers!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Deakin Review of Children s LiteratureSame topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207