Informatic analysis reveals Legionella as a source of novel natural products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microbial natural products are a crucial source of bioactive molecules and unique chemical scaffolds. Despite their importance, rediscovery of known natural products from established productive microbes has led to declining interest, even while emergent genomic data suggest that the majority of microbial natural products remain to be discovered. Now, new sources of microbial natural products must be defined in order to provide chemical scaffolds for the next generation of small molecules for therapeutic, agricultural, and industrial purposes. In this work, we use specialized bioinformatic programs, genetic knockouts, and comparative metabolomics to define the genus Legionella as a new source of novel natural products. We show that Legionella spp. hold a diverse collection of biosynthetic gene clusters for the production of polyketide and nonribosomal peptide natural products. To confirm this bioinformatic survey, we create targeted mutants of L. pneumophila and use comparative metabolomics to identify a novel polyketide surfactant. Using spectroscopic techniques, we show that this polyketide possesses a new chemical scaffold, and firmly demonstrate that this unexplored genus is a source for novel natural products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".