MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2299795114 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.151289

Pneumococcal Vaccination Strategies in the Real World of Chronically Ill Patients

2016· letter· en· W2299795114 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nico Wulffraat, Marloes W Heijstek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationPneumoniaImmunizationComorbidityPneumococcal vaccineIntensive care medicinePopulationPediatricsPublic healthPneumococcal pneumoniaImmunologyInternal medicineImmune systemEnvironmental healthStreptococcus pneumoniae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the world vaccination strategies are widely applied because they are cheap and cost-effective. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides recommendations for routine immunizations1. These recommendations are primarily based on vaccine studies performed in healthy children or elderly persons without significant comorbidity. For instance, the CAPITA study (Community-Acquired Pneumonia Immunization Trial in Adults) on about 85,000 adults aged 65 years and older is seen as a landmark study, demonstrating that a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine prevents a significant proportion of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in adults2. The study is of considerable public health significance. However, in the real world the pneumococcal vaccine is not administered to the entire healthy elderly population. In contrast, this and other vaccines are given especially to protect chronically ill patients. In the above-mentioned CAPITA study, adults were excluded if they resided in nursing homes, had significant comorbidity that could result in an immune-suppressed state, or had medications that could affect the immune response. As a result, the decision to vaccinate these chronically ill patients is left to the discretion of the doctor. In the rheumatology field this has led to numerous investigator-initiated studies in adult and pediatric rheumatic diseases. Several reviews were published with immunization recommendations for adults and children with rheumatic conditions3,4,5. These immunization recommendations take into account the 2 main issues that play a role in patients with rheumatic diseases using immunosuppressive drugs: the safety and the efficacy of vaccines. Regarding safety, the product labels of most vaccines state that concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs such as methotrexate (MTX) or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) are a contraindication for … Address correspondence to Dr. N.M. Wulffraat. E-mail: n.wulffraat{at}umcutrecht.nl

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→French-language works237,207→