MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 292: Time Course of Epinephrine Administration During Cardiac Arrest Shows Transient Increase in Aortic Pressure at the Cost of Persistent Decrease in Carotid Flow

2013· article· en· W2299822089 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Ramadeen, Xudong Hu, Albert K.Y. Tsui, Gregory M. T. Hare, Paul Dorian

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpinephrineAortic pressureCardiologyBlood pressureInternal medicineTransient (computer programming)Anesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epinephrine is routinely used during treatment of cardiac arrest. Administration may improve immediate resuscitation at the cost of long term survival. We hypothesized that epinephrine transiently increases aortic pressure, but decreases blood flow to the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: Six anesthetized Yorkshire pigs (31±4 kg) underwent 1 minute of untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF), followed by 9 minutes of guideline based CPR with mechanical compressions, then defibrillation. Epinephrine (1 mg IV) was administered 1-3 times per pig (median 2.5) at ≥3 minute intervals. Hemodynamic parameters were measured continuously with a micromanometer in the abdominal aorta and a perivascular flow probe around the carotid artery. Results: After 10 minutes of VF, 5 of 6 pigs were successfully defibrillated, but all 5 became asystolic or lacked pulsatile aortic pressure 30 minutes after defibrillation. During CPR prior to epinephrine injection, aortic systolic and diastolic pressures were 72±26 and 17±3 mmHg respectively, coronary perfusion pressure was 15±5 mmHg and antegrade carotid blood flow was 141±77 mL/min. Epinephrine produced a repeatable, transient effect on both aortic pressure and carotid blood flow (see Table). Aortic systolic and diastolic pressures increased above pre-injection values with peak pressures reached approximately 80 seconds after injection and stabilizing after 180 seconds. Carotid flow decreased below pre-injection values with nadir flow reached approximately 80 seconds after injection, and remained below baseline for 100 additional seconds or longer. Conclusions: The effect of epinephrine on hemodynamics during CPR is not consistent over time. Epinephrine produces differential effects on aortic pressure and carotid flow. Although epinephrine may transiently improve coronary perfusion, it may do so at the cost of brain perfusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→