MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299870281

Genesis of iron ore in the Snelgrove Lake Area, Labrador Trough, Western Labrador

2015· dissertation· en· W2299870281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicolas Lachance

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryHematiteDiagenesisMineralization (soil science)PetrographyBanded iron formationSedimentary rockProterozoicIron oreSedimentary depositional environmentMagnetiteMineralogyGeomorphologyPaleontologyTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Snelgrove Lake property, located in western Labrador, is underlain by the late Proterozoic Sokoman Formation, the same geological formation that hosts economically significant iron ore deposits elsewhere in Labrador and Quebec. This project aims to better understand the origin of the iron formation, the controls on grade of the iron ore including whether or not there is secondary iron enrichment, and the ambient marine environment in the late Paleoproterozoic, including ocean redox conditions present during the primary deposition of the iron formation. Iron formations in the Snelgrove Lake area consist of chemically precipitated jasper and Fe-rich sedimentary rocks that contain hard, metallic bluish-grey iron oxides, with total Fe2O3 ranging from 22 – 64 wt%. On the basis of petrography, iron minerals occur predominantly as: 1) syngenetically deposited (primary) iron oxides and iron silicates; 2) microplaty hematite (secondary and remobilized); and 3) euhedral magnetite (secondary). Despite textural features suggesting that microplaty hematite occurrences are due to secondary Fe-mobilization, the lack of coarse-grained textures and structurally controlled mineralization argues against hydrothermal enrichment as the cause. Furthermore, the general absence of hydrous ores, the lack of light rare earth element (LREE) enrichment within the iron formation, and the preservation of most primary sedimentary textures argues against pre- or post-metamorphic supergene enrichment. Evidence within suggests that iron was locally remobilized by post-depositional diagenetic fluids, which resulted in the alteration, modification and enrichment of original bedding with Fe-minerals. The current physical assemblage of iron-bearing minerals, and the local iron grades, were also significantly affected by the early diagenetic appearance of silica cements. Those samples that received silica cement during early diagenesis contain lower Fe grades, and show signs of having been less affected by compaction than those that had no silica cement. The geochemistry of the iron formation suggests various inputs from hydrothermal, detrital, and hydrogenous sources. Immobile element contents indicate the Snelgrove Lake iron formation has minimal detrital input, but that which is present was likely derived from a mafic detrital source. Flat to weakly positive Eu/Eu* anomalies are common and suggest precipitation of iron minerals in the ocean from low temperature fluids (< 250°C). The iron formations also have REE-Y signatures comparable to other late Paleoproterozoic iron formations and have flat post-Archean average shale (PAAS)- normalized patterns, and Y/Ho ratios ranging from 20-50. The Y/Ho ratios of late Paleoproterozoic iron formations have wider ranges and are generally lower in comparison to early Paleoproterozoic iron formations and is interpreted to reflect the appearance of oxygen in the oceans at that time, and more precisely, the appearance of a redox-stratified ocean. The paleoredox-conditions present during the deposition of iron formation in Snelgrove Lake, as deduced from Ce/Ce* anomalies and other redoxsensitive elements, are generally indicative of an anoxic environment, while its bounding units record signatures that reflect deposition in a more oxic environment, thus suggesting deposition in a redox-stratified basin with iron precipitation near a redox-boundary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207