Green Emission of Terbium Doped Silicon Rich Silicon Oxide Films Obtained By Chemical Vapor Deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of silicon concentration, annealing temperature and influence of post-growth hydrogen incorporation on terbium (Tb3+) luminescence was investigated for thin silicon rich silicon oxide films (SRSO). The structures were deposited by means of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (ECR-PECVD). The structural properties of these films were investigated by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, transmission electron microscopy, FTIR and Raman scattering. The optical properties were investigated by means of photoluminescence, cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence decay spectroscopy. In this poster, we present a detailed discussion of these issues and determine the optimal conditions of the SRSO films from the point of view of Tb3+ emission properties. An increase in the Si concentration in SRSO influences the emission properties in two ways. First of all, the refractive index of the film increases which enhances the oscillator strength of the optical transitions. On the other hand, the non-radiative recombination also increases, limiting the PL intensity. Therefore, from the point of view of emission efficiency, the optimal Si concentration in the film is about 35 at.% Si. Besides the Si concentration, another effect investigated in this work was the influence of the annealing temperature on Tb3+ emission. It was found that the PL intensity increases as a function of the annealing temperature. This effect was ascribed to the structural changes of the SRSO matrix. At early stages of the annealing (up to annealing temperature equal to 900oC) the most important factor enhancing the Tb3 emission intensity is a reduction in the number of non-radiative recombination centers. However, as shown by Raman measurements, starting from Ta =1100oC structural changes occur in the matrix (crystallization and formation of the Si nanocrystals) and the Tb environment significantly changes. Therefore, the further increase in the PL intensity obtained for high annealing temperatures (temperatures in the 1100–1200 oC range) can be ascribed to the increasing oscillator strength of the intra-4f transitions, induced by the change of the crystal field around the ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".