MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300339309 · doi:10.1093/sf/sow016

Organic Struggle: The Movement for Sustainable Agriculture in the United States By Brian K. Obach MIT Press. 2015. 328 pp. $29 hardcover

2016· article· en· W2300339309 on OpenAlexaff
Josée Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Forces · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsOrganic farmingAppealPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsAgricultureLawHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an age when consumers are increasingly conscientious of their food choices, the “organic” label doesn’t have a lot of radical cachet. With the rise of “Big Organics” (read: corporate organics), it is now possible to pick up an organic apple at Walmart, or peruse an entire aisle of organic snack foods in a conventional supermarket. Brian Obach’s book, Organic Struggle, explains how this situation has come to pass—how organics became popular with consumers and converted millions of acres to more sustainable production practices, but ultimately lost its radical appeal. Writing with a scholarly, measured approach that is still sensitive to organic’s transformative ambitions, this book yields new insights on the organic label’s lost opportunities, ecological gains, and pragmatic underpinnings. Obach’s book rests on the premise that to truly understand the political significance of “Big Organics,” we need to understand precisely how the organic food movement evolved. Accordingly, he spends a considerable proportion of the book’s pages documenting organics’ emergence from Rodale’s Organic Farming and Gardening (first published in 1942), to countercultural farms in the 1960s and 1970s, to a nationally certified labeling schema—the National Organic Program—overseen by the United States Department of Agriculture and the target of Washington lobbyists. Sometimes the level of historical detail is overwhelming, but readers of Organic Struggle will be rewarded with a richer sense of how small organic firms (e.g., Odwalla) came to be owned by large corporations (e.g., Coca-Cola), and will better understand the complex array of actors that mobilized to support, contest, and critique national organic standards. More broadly, readers will gain a clearer sense of how challenging it is to balance market growth with social justice and sustainability. For this reason, the book’s appeal extends beyond those with an interest in organic agriculture, as it speaks to a more wide-reaching political tension of how to make eco-social change through market mechanisms—and whether this is even possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial ForcesSame topicOrganic Food and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207