MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2300383175 · doi:10.5194/bg-2015-558

Controls of longitudinal variation in δ<sup>13</sup>C-DIC in rivers: A global meta-analysis

2016· article· en· W2300383175 on OpenAlexafffund
Katherine A. Roach, Marco A. Rodríguez, Yves Paradis, Gilbert Cabana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDissolved organic carbonδ13CEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Atmospheric sciencesChemistryEnvironmental chemistryGeologyStable isotope ratioPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. We conducted a literature survey to investigate controls and spatial and temporal patterns of δ13C-DIC and deviations between δ13C-DIC and the δ13C signature of DIC at isotopic equilibrium with the atmosphere (Δδ13C-DIC) in streams and rivers throughout the world. We used generalized additive mixed models to relate Δδ13C-DIC and δ13C-DIC in lotic ecosystems to ecological variables including elevation, Strahler order, and partial pressure of dissolved CO2 (pCO2), and to examin e seasonal shifts in Δδ13C-DIC and δ13C-DIC over a range in latitude. Elevation, Strahler order, and DIC concentrations explained a large fraction of the variation in Δδ13C-DIC, and these variables plus pH and pCO2 explained much of the variation in δ13C-DIC. Seasonal fluctuations in δ13C-DIC were most apparent in rivers located in temperate regions with seasonal snow cover. Small streams tended to have lower δ13C-DIC values than large rivers. Overall, our analysis indicates that processes that add CO2 to the water column, including groundwater inputs, decomposition, and respiration, should have a greater influence on δ13C-DIC than processes that remove CO2. Both physical (gas exchange with the atmosphere, weathering, ice cover) and biolog ical (respiration in regions with high C4 grass abundance, photosynthesis by cyanobacteria) processes appear to control δ13C-DIC in streams and rivers, but the relative importance of these processes shifts from upstream to downstream.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.008
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→