MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300492305 · doi:10.2298/abs141210059i

Adjustment of L1 neurosecretory neuron activity in response to different stressors in gypsy moth caterpillars

2015· article· en· W2300492305 on OpenAlexaff
Larisa Ilijin, Marija Mrdaković, Vesna Perić‐Mataruga, Jelica Lazarević, Dragana Matić, Dajana Todorović, Milena Vlahović

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Biological Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
FundersMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
KeywordsTannic acidCytoplasmBiologyMetaboliteInternal medicineAndrologyCell biologyEndocrinologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gypsy moth caterpillars were exposed to an increased rearing temperature of 35?C and diet, supplemented with Cd, a heavy metal pollutant, and tannic acid, a plant secondary metabolite. After 3 days? exposure to stressors, changes in the number, morphometric parameters of L1 neurosecretory neurons (nsn) (sizes of the nsn and their nuclei), and the quantity of neurosecretory material in the cytoplasm of the neurons were estimated. Acute exposure to the high temperature of 35?C induced increases in the number of L1 nsn, their size and the size of their nuclei with prolonged exposure time. After acute exposure to different Cd concentrations, the number of L1 nsn was reduced, their size increased and the size of their nuclei decreased. Together with the enhanced relative density of the cytoplasm, our results point to an intensive synthesis and retention of neurosecretory material in the neurons. The relative density of the neurosecretory material in the cytoplasm increased at the thermal treatment, suggesting intensive synthesis and secretory activity in L1 nsn. Caterpillars reared on an artificial substrate with the addition of high concentrations of tannic acid (TA) showed a decreased number of nsn, increased cell size and decreased size of their nuclei. The reduction in the relative density of the cytoplasm led us to conclude that this treatment induced a high synthetic activity of L1 nsn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Biological SciencesSame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207