W poszukiwaniu wspólnych wartości: potrójny portret szestidiesiatników (Rimma Kazakowa, Albert Lichanow, Walerij Pietroczenkow)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
W POSZUKIWANIU WSPOLNYCH WARTOŚCI : POTROJNY PORTRET SZESTIDIESIATNIKOW (RIMMA KAZAKOWA, ALBERT LICHANOW, WALERY PIETROCZENKOW) Streszczenie Tematem artykulu jest tworczośc trzech literatow, ktorzy debiutowali w latach 60. minionego stulecia: jeden z nich to prozaik, autor utworow dla dzieci i mlodziezy (Albert Lichanow), dwaj pozostali to poeci. Autorka omawia zarowno ich tworczośc, jak losy – Rimma Kazakowa niedawno zmarla , Pietroczenkow emigrowal trzydzieści temu i mieszka w Waszyngtonie, zaś Lichanow organizuje na szeroką skale pomoc dzieciom. Rimma Kazakowa kontynuowala tradycje poezji Srebrnego Wieku. Swą poetyką nawiązywala do impresjonizmu. Uprawiala liryke filozoficzną i milosną, ocenianą jako feministyczna. Jej utwory określają charakterystyczne dla konca lat 50. poszukiwania etyczne oraz negacja patosu i propagandy. Alberta Lichanowa nazywa autorka artykulu czlowiekiem, ktory zawsze plynąl pod prąd. Jako dziennikarz pisal od lat 60. o problemach dzieci i wychowania, obecnie zaś popularyzuje w Rosji czytelnictwo, pisze naukowe prace z zakresu pedagogiki, zaklada czasopisma dla dzieci, poświeca najmlodszym swe powieści i opowiadania (np. Nikt, Polamana lalka). Lichanow jest zwolennikiem wartości etycznych w znacznym stopniu ksztaltowanych dziś przez cerkiew prawoslawną. Poeta Walery Pietroczenkow swą tworczośc poświeca Rosji i jej kulturze, a przede wszystkim Petersburgowi — swemu rodzinnemu miastu. Jego poezja nawiązuje do tradycyjnych obrazow kultury i historii rosyjskiej i światowej, jej bohaterowie to ludzie silni, sprzeciwiający sie zlu – „świeci starcy” cerkwi prawoslawnej i wielcy tworcy literatury. Trojke prezentowanych tworcow (mniej znanych szestidiesiatnikow) lączy humanistyczny i etyczny wymiar ich pisarstwa, wartości chrześcijanskie, ku ktorym zmierzali przez lata. Lola Zwonariowa IN SEARCH OF COMMON VALUES: THE TRIPLE PORTRAIT OF SHESTIDIESATNIKI (RIMMA KAZAKOVA, ALBERT LIKHANOV, VALERY PIETROCHENKOV) Summary The subject of this paper is the oeuvre of three writers, who debuted in the sixties of the previous century. One of them is a prose writer, the author of books for children and teenagers (Albert Likhanov), remaining two are poets. The author of this paper discusses their oeuvre as well as their lives. Rimma Kazakova died not so long time ago, Pietrochenkov has emigrated thirty years ago and now he lives in Washington, while Likhanov organizes help for children on a large scale. Rimma Kazakova continued the tradition of the Silver Age. Her poetics referred to the impressionism. She cultivated the poetry of philosophy and love, judged by many as feminist. Her works define, peculiar to the end of fifties, ethical quests as well as negation of pathos and propaganda. The author calls Albert Likhanov a man who always swam against the tide. Since the sixties, as a journalist he wrote about children and education`s problems. Currently he popularizes reading in Russia, writes scholarly works in the field of pedagogy, sets up journals for children, and devotes to the youngest his novels and short stories (e.g. Nobody, Broken Doll). Likhanov is the supporter of ethical values to a large extent shaped by the Eastern Orthodox Church. The poet Valery Pietrochenkov devotes his works to Russia and its culture, first of all to the Petersburg – his home town. His poetry refers to traditional pictures of Russian and world-wide culture and history. His heroes are strong people who stand against the evil – „saint old men” of the Orthodox Church, and great literary authors. The three of presented authors (less known “shestidiesatniki”) connect humanistic and ethical dimension of their writing and Christian values to which they headed for many years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".