MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker for men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC): Results from the ASCENT trial

2007· article· en· W2300829931 on OpenAlexaff
Julie N. Graff, Alshad S. Lalani, S. Lee, John G. Curd, W. David Henner, Chris Ryan, Peter Venner, Joseph D. Ruether, K. N., Tomasz M. Beer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyProstate cancerC-reactive proteinHazard ratioProportional hazards modelBiomarkerDocetaxelOncologyCancerInflammationConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5074 Background: Concentrations of blood proteins such as PSA, hemoglobin (HGB), and LDH are associated with survival in men with AIPC. We sought to identify additional blood proteins associated with prognosis in chemotherapy-treated AIPC patients. Methods: Baseline plasma samples were stored (-80°C) from 160 patients enrolled in the ASCENT trial, a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial comparing weekly docetaxel plus DN-101, an oral high-dose formulation of calcitriol, to weekly docetaxel. Multiplex immunoassays measured 16 cytokine/chemokine or cardiovascular/inflammation markers including IL-1a, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFa, MCP-1, EGF, VEGF, PAI-1, MMP-9, sE-Selectin, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1 and C-reactive protein (CRP). Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to assess association between baseline biomarkers and survival or skeletal-related event (SRE)-free survival, and logistic regression for PSA Working Group Criteria response. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar to those of the 90 patients without samples, except for age (mean 68.0 vs. 70.6 yrs) and HGB (12.8 vs. 12.2 g/dL). CRP was the only biomarker that significantly predicted shorter overall survival (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20–1.65, p < 0.0001). When CRP (continuous) was entered into a multivariate model using 13 baseline variables (including PSA, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, HGB, ECOG Performance Status, age) only elevated CRP remained a significant predictor (p<0.0001) of shorter survival. When categorized as normal (= 8 mg/L) or abnormal (> 8 mg/L), elevated CRP was a significant predictor of shorter survival (HR 2.96 95% CI 1.52–5.77, p = 0.001) as was HGB (p=0.007). Elevated CRP was also associated with a lower probability of PSA response (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60–0.92, p = 0.007) and a shorter SRE-free survival (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15–1.48, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Elevated levels of plasma CRP appear to be a strong predictor of poor survival and development of SREs in AIPC patients receiving docetaxel-based therapy. The use of CRP as a risk marker and its potential as a surrogate marker of treatment effect should be prospectively evaluated in future clinical trials in advanced prostate cancer. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisFrench-language works237,207