Conodont paleontology of the Permian Sabine Bay, Assistance and Trold Fiord Formations, Northern Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A succession of late Early through Medial Permian conodont faunas is documented for the first time from the calcareous, fine grained, quartzose sandstones of the Assistance and Trold Fiord Formations on northern Elles-mere Island, Northwest Territories. Of the taxa identified and described, one species and three subspecies are proposed as new. The taxa include, in chronological order: Neogondolella idahoensis subsp. indet., Neostrep-tognathodus prayi, Neogondolella idahoensis n.subsp. A, Anchignathodus minutus, Neogondolella serrata(?), N. n.sp. B, N. postserrata(?), N. bitteri n.subsp. C, and N. rosenkrantzi n.subsp. D. Numerous ramiform elements are also associated with Neogondolella idahoensis n.subsp. A. These elements may comprise part of a multielement Neogondolella apparatus or they may represent separate form species. In observation of their questionable status, a somewhat unsatisfactory dual taxonomy is proposed for these elements, and includes the following taxa: N. idahoensis n.subsp. A - Xanio-gnathus tortilis, N. idahoensis n.subsp. A - Ellisonia excavata, N. idahoensis n.subsp. A - Ellisonia tribulosa, and N. idahoensis n.subsp. A - Pri-oniodella decrescens. Statistical work on the abundant platform elements of N. idahoensis n.subsp. A provides evidence for minor 'evolutionary trends of increasing size and increasing number of denticles upsection. Comparison of these con-odonts with N. serrata.and N. postserrata from the Great Basin of SW USA suggests that the phylogenetic development of Permian Neogondolella followed an,, evolutionary path.more appropriate to punctuated equilibria than to phyletic gradualism. The conodont taxa indicate that the Assistance Formation is Upper Leonardian to Uppermost Roadian in age whereas the Trold Fiord Formation includes most of the Wordian.stage. These two formations have been separated into five subdivisions on the basis of both lithology. and the presence or absence of various biota 1 A sixth, subdivision is described for the Sabine Bay Formation which underlies the Assistance and where conodonts are apparently absent. Lithologic and biotic evidence (including trace fossils and mega- and microbiota) point to shallow, offshore marine conditions well within the photic zone and characterized by low energy and slow depositional rates, for most of the conodont bearing strata. A much thicker correlative section to the south represents, in large part, a delta front sequence. The Sabine Bay Formation, on the other hand, is composed of shoreface sandstones, possibly in a barrier island setting. The results of this research indicate that conodonts may be very promising for correlation of Permian strata in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and for worldwide comparison. More work within the Sverdrup Basin, including both marginal and basinal sections , is necessary to provide a good biozonation of these marine Permian strata. The use of the abundant brachiopods in combination with the conodonts is probably the best way to resolve this zonation. The taxonomic.descriptions and subdivisions proposed herein should provide a foundation for future work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".