MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2301998664 · doi:10.4130/jaev.13.1733

Efficient Design of a High Speed PMSM Drive for Electric Vehicle Application Using Real Time Simulator

2015· article· en· W2301998664 on OpenAlexafffund
Amin Zabihinejad, P. Viarouge, Simon Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian Electric Vehicles · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsSimulationInverterPoint (geometry)Automotive industryDriving simulatorPower (physics)TorqueEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Set (abstract data type)Computer scienceControl engineeringAutomotive engineeringControl (management)VoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel approach has been employed in order to investigate the efficient design of a vector control drive of a high speed PMSM for automotive application using analytical method and real time simulator. Most of vector control drives set the d-axis current to zero to decrease the magnitude of the source current and working with unit power factor. However, the optimal d-axis current is dependent to the motor specifications. An optimal estimation scheme has been proposed and tested in order to work with maximum efficiency based on the operation point. In the high speed application, because of high losses density and low capacity of heat dissipation, the importance of working in maximum efficiency point will be clear more and more. Also, measurement of inverter losses is very complicate in the analytical approach. In this paper, the precise model of the switches has been implemented using real time simulator. Real time simulator, is a complex electronic circuit which is composed of CPUs, FPGA, etc.-s known as an efficient tool obtains very exact model of the IGBTs in order to have the precise losses model of the motor and drive. Both of the analytical approach and real time simulator prove the validity of the optimal estimation scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Asian Electric VehiclesSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207