MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Increase of myogenic tone in the cerebral arteries of dyslipidemic mice is not due to a vessel wall remodelling

2009· article· en· W2302250629 on OpenAlexaffabout
Virginie Bolduc, Annick Drouin, Isabelle Robillard, Christine Des Rosiers, Éric Thorin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral arteriesVascular toneArterial wallCardiologyInternal medicineAnatomyMedicineChemistryVasodilation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of dyslipidemia in mediating changes in vascular structure, mechanic and function is poorly understood. Isolated pressurized cerebral arteries of LDLr‐/‐hApoB+/+ (ATX) mice showed an increase of myogenic tone (MT) compared to WT at 3‐mo‐old (22 ± 2 % vs 14 ±1 % at 80 mmHg, p<0.05). We hypothesized that the increased MT was associated with vessel wall remodelling. Cerebral compliance, measured as pressure‐induced dilatation in the presence of potassium cyanide (7.7 mM), showed no difference between ATX and WT mice. Because ATX mice present a 7 fold increase in circulating cholesterol and triglyceride, we studied the phospholipids (PL) bilayer composition. There was no variation between groups in the amounts of C16:0, C18:0, C18:1n9, C18:1n7, C18:2, C20:4 and C22:6 contained in the PL and free fatty acids fractions extracted from total brain vessels. A quantitation kit measured similar level of free cholesterol in brain vessel between groups. Western blot showed no difference in collagen III deposition in the vessel wall. In conclusion, our data suggest that increase in MT in cerebral arteries of ATX mice is not due to a vessel wall remodelling. This work is financed by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→