Data‐driven optimal terminal iterative learning control with initial value dynamic compensation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iterative learning control is an effective control strategy for control of batch processes and initial condition is one of the most important factors affecting convergence of iterative learning batch process control. In this study, a novel initial value dynamic compensation‐based data‐driven optimal terminal iterative learning control (IDC‐DDOTILC) approach is proposed for non‐linear systems under random initial conditions. The unknown influence on the terminal output caused by the initial states is deduced by using a dynamical linearisation of the controlled non‐linear system along the iteration direction, and then the unknown influence is estimated iteratively and incorporated into the learning control law. As a result, the proposed IDC‐DDOTILC can drive the terminal output of the plant to attain the target value at the endpoint asymptotically under iteration‐varying initial conditions. Two chemical engineering examples including a batch reactor and a fed‐batch ethanol fermentation process are used to demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed control algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it