Inactive Disease in Enthesitis-related Arthritis: Association of Increased Body Mass Index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) were less likely to achieve and sustain inactive disease than children with other subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increased body mass index (BMI) on clinical features of the disease and to investigate whether being overweight or obese limits the possibility of achieving clinically inactive disease in patients with ERA. METHODS: The hospital charts of 72 patients with ERA were reviewed. Demographic and clinical findings were recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they had "healthy weight" (BMI < 85th percentile) or "increased weight" (BMI ≥ 85th percentile) at baseline. The primary outcome of this study was to achieve inactive disease at 1 year after the initiation of therapy. The inactive disease criterion of Wallace, et al was used to define inactive disease status. RESULTS: Twenty patients had increased BMI. The frequency of tarsitis and ankle involvement was higher in patients with increased weight. Thirty-seven patients were inactive at the end of 1 year. In univariate analyses, male sex, increased BMI, ankle involvement, and tarsitis were found to be associated with failure to achieve inactive disease. Multivariate backward stepwise regression analyses revealed that failure to achieve clinically inactive disease was associated with increased BMI and ankle involvement. CONCLUSION: Being overweight or obese was associated with failure to achieve inactive disease in patients with ERA. Because body weight is a modifiable factor, individualized interventions may have clinical implications for better therapeutic outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".