MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302999563 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2015-0346

Factors affecting germination and emergence of glyphosate-resistant hybrid corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and its progeny

2016· article· en· W2302999563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Parminder S. Chahal, Amit J. Jhala

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZea maysGlyphosateGerminationAgronomyBiologyGenetically modified maizeGenetically modified cropsTransgeneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laboratory and greenhouse experiments were conducted to compare the effects of agronomic and environmental factors on germination and emergence of glyphosate-resistant (GR) hybrid corn (Mycogen 2G681) and its progeny. The germination of GR hybrid corn and its progeny was 84% to 97% at day/night temperatures of 15/10 °C to 42.5/30 °C, while higher (45/35 °C) and lower (0/0 °C) temperatures reduced germination to ≤6%. Germination was &gt;90% at all alternating as well as constant light and dark periods at a fixed day/night temperature of 30/20 °C. At osmotic stress level of 0 to −0.3 MPa, &gt;90% of hybrid corn and progeny seeds germinated, while osmotic stress level of −0.4 to −1.3 MPa reduced germination to &lt;65%. Greater than 90% germination was observed at a wide range of salt concentrations (0–160 mM), with the lowest germination (53%) at 320 mM. More than 87% cumulative seedling emergence of hybrid corn and its progeny occurred at a depth of 0.5–6 cm and hybrid corn emergence reduced from 86% to 23% compared with 21% to 2% reduction of progeny at 1 and 2 d of flooding, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207