Addiction in Adolescence: Why don't adolescent addicts turn up for treatment?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been well established that prevalence rates of addiction are reportedly higher among youth than adults. It is also widely reported that very few adolescent addicts turn up for treatment. This paper outlines some of the possible reasons as to why this is the case. These are that (i) adolescents don’t seek treatment in general, (ii) treating other underlying problems may help adolescent addiction problems, (iii) attending treatment programs may be stigmatizing for adolescents, (iv) adolescents may have committed suicide before getting treatment, (v) addicts may be lying or distorting the truth when they fill out survey questionnaires, (vi) adolescents may not understand what they are asked in questionnaires, (vii) screening instruments for adolescent addicts may be being used incorrectly, (viii) adolescent addiction may be socially constructed to be non-problematic and (ix) adolescent excesses may change too quickly to warrant treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".