L'inclusion des enfants ayant des incapacités dans les services de garde : comment soutenir d'avantage les éducatrices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le present texte porte sur l' inclusion 1 des enfants ayant des incapacites dans les milieux de garde. Il s'inscrit dans le cadre des travaux de maitrise en sante communautaire a l'Universite Laval, Quebec. Rejoignant le champ d'exercice de l'ergotherapie, la demarche se base sur la participation et l'inclusion sociale. Il s'agit de determiner les besoins de formation des educatrices 2 , afin de les soutenir lors de l'inclusion des enfants ayant des besoins particuliers dans les services de garde. Quatre themes principaux sont abordes: 1) la situation actuelle de l'accueil en service de garde dans le reseau quebecois ; 2) l'integration et l'inclusion sociales des enfants handicapes ; 3) les facteurs a considerer pour surmonter les obstacles a l'inclusion ; 4) les roles de l'ergotherapeute en lien avec les besoins de formation des educatrices. Les resultats de la demarche sont presentes, ainsi que des recommandations pour une inclusion reussie. Des propositions d'interventions et de recherche quant a l'inclusion terminent cette reflexion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".