MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2304410502 · doi:10.14288/1.0065495

Estimation of limb occlusion pressure by adaptation of oscillometry for surgical tourniquet control

2010· article· en· W2304410502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark E. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourniquetMedicineOcclusionAdaptation (eye)Physical medicine and rehabilitationAnesthesiaPsychologySurgeryNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pneumatic tourniquets are widely used in surgery of the extremities to occlude the vessels of the limb, thereby providing a bloodless field for dissection so that the surgeon may operate more quickly and accurately. Over-pressurization of the tourniquet cuff may lead to postoperative complications such as temporary or permanent paralysis of the limb. This motivated the development of adaptive tourniquet systems which could regulate the tourniquet pressure just above the limb occlusion pressure (LOP), or the minimum tourniquet pressure required to prevent blood flow past the cuff for a given duration. Previous adaptive tourniquet systems suffered from several problems which limited their practical utility in the operating room. This thesis describes the adaptation of oscillometry, a technique widely used in the noninvasive estimation of blood pressure, to the estimation of LOP in the surgical environment for application in a clinically practical adaptive tourniquet system. Improved oscillometric LOP estimation performance was obtained through the development of a filter for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio of the oscillometric pulses during periods of limb manipulation, the development of a heuristic real-time pattern recognition algorithm for extracting oscillometric pulses from signal data corrupted by limb movements, and the development of a new method for rapidly estimating the LOP which needs only one-third of the signal data required by a widely-used oscillometric approach to produce an estimate of comparable accuracy. In addition to these contributions, a new tourniquet cuff was developed which achieves an improved fit to the limb, thereby enhancing performance and reliability over that obtained from conventional tourniquets as both an oscillometric occlusion sensor and as a limb-occluding device. An adaptive tourniquet system which integrated these improvements was developed and used in a clinical study involving four orthopaedic surgeons and 16 patients. Clinical trials of the latest system version in which circumstances permitted the use of adaptive control showed that the average limb-applied pressure was reduced by 35%, or from the conventional standard of 250 mm Hg to 162 mm Hg, in the upper limb surgeries, and by 38%, or from the conventional standard of 300 mm Hg to 187 mm Hg, in the lower limb surgeries. These significant reductions in the pressure indicate the potential effectiveness of adaptive tourniquet control and improved cuff design on reducing the risk of patient injuries from excessive tissue compression. Furthermore, unlike all previous implementations, this system is currently being evaluated on a routine basis in orthopaedic surgical procedures performed at Vancouver General Hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→