Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a skin disorder that is said to be "frustrating" and "difficult to treat." It is characterized by recurrent hives for more than 6 weeks, and is further divided into spontaneous or inducible by physical stimuli.(1) To better understand dermatologists' perspective of this disorder, a survey was conducted with Canadian dermatologists. METHODS: A detailed online practice survey was sent to all currently practicing Canadian dermatologists. RESULTS: In all, 80 responses were received (response rate of 20%). Most respondents in Canada had treated patients with CSU (98.4%), with many of the patients having the disease last over 6 months (86.6%). A majority of the patients were female, with 84.1% of the respondents having over 50% of their patients as female. Most patients were over the age of 30 (74.2%). Of dermatologists, 85.7% felt that investigations were unhelpful in diagnosing CSU in a patient. Of respondents, 37.1% were not satisfied with current treatment methods of CSU, and 43.6% somewhat satisfied. Popular therapies included H1 and H2 antihistamines, oral corticosteroids, and montelukast. There were 16.1% of dermatologists who had over 50% of their patients refractory to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear demographic preponderance for CSU patients with a majority as female over age 30. Investigations ordered for CSU patients do not seem to be helpful among dermatologists. Satisfaction with current therapies and investigations was quite low among Canadian dermatologists, suggesting new therapies are indicated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".