Modeling Water Demand Considering Impact of Climate Change – a Toronto Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Municipal water demand modeling is a complex process that involves human response to climatic and non-climatic conditions.Forecasting of water demand is indispensable for the daily operation of existing water supply systems and the planning of future systems.The prospect of global climate change added a new dimension to the existing uncertainty associated with the forecasting of municipal demand for water.In this chapter an analysis of Toronto's daily water demand is carried out and a methodology for the forecasting of this demand is provided.A model for the prediction of the daily water demand of the city of Toronto is developed.The model provides a tool to optimize the daily operation of the water supply system with the goal of minimizing energy cost and improving water quality.A second model for the long-term forecasting of Toronto's water demand is also presented.The longterm demand model is used to evaluate the impact of climate change on Toronto's future water demand.The study has shown that a 1°C increase in summer maximum daily temperature would result in a 2% increase in average summer demand and 1.8% increase in peak day demand.Toronto's peak day demand of year 2000 would increase by 23% as a result of a 15% increase in population coupled with having a summer in which the maximum daily temperature increase by 5°C and the rainfall decrease by 10%.Planners and engineers need to consider climate change scenarios in the planning strategy of future water supply systems and delivering projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".