MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304712073 · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35054-x

Resident Research Training Objectives and Requirements of the Association of Academic Professionals in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

2011· letter· en· W2304712073 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Graeme N. Smith, Helen McNamara, Paul Bessette, Victoria M. Allen, Sue Ross, Jane Schulz, Roger A. Pierson, Bianca Nadeau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryAssociation of Academic Professionals in Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversité de SherbrookeQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstetrics and gynaecologyObstetricsGynecologyMedical educationFamily medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0380.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207