Теория социально-ролевой адаптации к усыновлению Д. Кирка
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article represents the theory of Canadian sociologist and social psychologist D. Kirk that has become a classic for foreign researchers of adoption. It deals with the topic of adoptive parents' role adjustment to adoption. The key concept of the theory is discussed: adoptive parenthood is a special form of parenthood, as it can be characterized by incongruous role obligations. The process of adoptive parents' adjustment to this psychological inconsistency author defines as making difficult choice between two opposite kinds of roles they assume: «acknowledgement of differences» between biological and adoptive parenthood and «rejection of differences». = В статье подробно рассматривается и анализируется теория канадского социолога и социального психолога Д. Кирка, ставшая классикой для зарубежных исследователей проблемы усыновления. Теория посвящена проблеме социально-ролевой адаптации к усыновлению. Обсуждается ключевой тезис теории Кирка: родительство усыновителей - это особая форма родительства, характеризующаяся несовместимыми ролевыми требованиями. Процесс социально-ролевой адаптации усыновителей трактуется как сложный выбор между двумя противоположными стратегиями: «отрицание различий» либо «признание различий» между родительством усыновителей и биологическим родительством.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".