MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304911753

Теория социально-ролевой адаптации к усыновлению Д. Кирка

2012· article· ru· W2304911753 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Library of the Belarusian State University (Belarusian State University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article represents the theory of Canadian sociologist and social psychologist D. Kirk that has become a classic for foreign researchers of adoption. It deals with the topic of adoptive parents' role adjustment to adoption. The key concept of the theory is discussed: adoptive parenthood is a special form of parenthood, as it can be characterized by incongruous role obligations. The process of adoptive parents' adjustment to this psychological inconsistency author defines as making difficult choice between two opposite kinds of roles they assume: «acknowledgement of differences» between biological and adoptive parenthood and «rejection of differences». = В статье подробно рассматривается и анализируется теория канадского социолога и социального психолога Д. Кирка, ставшая классикой для зарубежных исследователей проблемы усыновления. Теория посвящена проблеме социально-ролевой адаптации к усыновлению. Обсуждается ключевой тезис теории Кирка: родительство усыновителей - это особая форма родительства, характеризующаяся несовместимыми ролевыми требованиями. Процесс социально-ролевой адаптации усыновителей трактуется как сложный выбор между двумя противоположными стратегиями: «отрицание различий» либо «признание различий» между родительством усыновителей и биологическим родительством.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.013
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Library of the Belarusian State University (Belarusian State University)Same topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207