MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2305065790 · doi:10.14288/1.0055993

Factors influencing the provision of health education programs for patients during hospitalization

2009· article· en· W2305065790 on OpenAlexaff
Denise L. Hawthorne

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBusinessNursingMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health education has been an essential part of health care for many years. Some acute care hospitals provide health education programs for patients during hospitalization. These programs are offered only in certain patient care areas; therefore, all patients do not have access to this service. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe factors that influence the provision of health education programs for patients during hospitalization on medical surgical patient care areas. Nurses make up approximately 70% of the health care professionals in acute care hospitals; therefore, a nursing perspective on this issue was sought. Using a descriptive, qualitative approach and the PRECEDE model for health promotion planning and evaluation, 14 registered nurses in various positions in an acute care community-based hospital were interviewed. Data from this study were classified as direct or indirect influences on the provision of health education programs for patients. Six main conclusions were drawn: (a) no Type 2 , "planned" health education program was provided for patients during hospitalization, (b) a Type 3, "comprehensive" health education program was provided for specific patients - namely those recovering from a heart attack, (c) the influence of the medical model on the provision of health education programs for patients during hospitalization was significant and pervasive, (d) nurses and other health care professionals were unaware of the impact the medical model had on their approach to health education programs for patients, (e) factors, in addition to time and resources, were identified as important in influencing the provision of health education programs, and (f) more exploration is needed to identify additional factors in the PRECEDE model, in order to understand the phenomenon regarding the provision of health education programs for patients during hospitalization in an acute care facility. Previous studies have fallen short in grasping the basis for the disparity in the provision of health education programs for patients during hospitalization. Therefore, more studies are required in this area to fully understand the factors and challenges involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207