MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract WP273: Reversal of Dabigatran’s Anticoagulant Activity in the Monkey by a Specific Antidote and Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling

2013· article· en· W230569140 on OpenAlexaff
Joshuaine G. Toth, Guanfa Gan, Joanne van Ryn, Holly Dursema, Jennifer A. Isler, Kelly Coble, John Burke, Bojan Lalovic, Stephen C. Olson

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsStuart Olson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntidoteDabigatranMedicinePharmacologyPharmacokineticsVolume of distributionIdarucizumabPharmacodynamicsAnesthesiaAnticoagulantProthrombin complex concentrateInternal medicineToxicityWarfarinAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study is to determine pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of dabigatran and its antidote (a humanized Fab against dabigatran) in the monkey and to develop a combined mechanistic mathematical model to describe the data. Rhesus monkeys (n = 2/group) received either 12 mg/kg/day of dabigatran etexilate (DE) or vehicle orally on Days 1-4, 15-18 and 29-32 with a single IV dose of the antidote at 30, 90 and 175 mg/kg administered 90 minutes after DE on Days 4, 18 and 32. PK parameters of the antidote and sum dabigatran (dabigatran plus its glucuronides) were determined after measurements of plasma concentrations. Coagulation activity was measured using a diluted thrombin time assay. The PK of the antidote were not affected by dabigatran. Clearance of the antidote was low (0.87 mL/min/kg) and steady-state volume of distribution was small (0.06 L/kg), indicating that the antidote was mostly restricted to plasma. The plasma profile of the antidote was bi-phasic with a short initial phase t 1/2 of 0.4 hour (h) and a terminal phase t 1/2 of 4.3 h. Complete reversal of dabigatran’s anticoagulant activity was observed immediately after antidote dosing at all 3 dose levels as measured by the diluted thrombin time assay, and the degree to which this reversal effect was maintained over an extended period (24 h) was dose-dependent. A mechanistic ordinary differential equation model, based on the mass action kinetics for describing the distribution, binding and elimination of dabigatran and its antidote, was developed by combining the PK models for dabigatran and the antidote and adding the binding interaction (1:1 stoichiometry) between the two compounds. The combined PK/PD model of dabigatran and antidote was able to describe the in vivo PK/PD data observed in monkeys. In conclusion, the antidote successfully reversed the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran in the monkey in a dose-dependent manner, and our combined mathematical model accurately describes monkey PK/PD data of sum dabigatran and its antidote. Insights gained from this model will be used to guide model development for clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→