Gulf War Illness: Is there lasting damage to the endocrine-immune circuitry?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reported previously that the persistence of complex immune, endocrine and neurological symptoms that afflict up to one third of veterans from the 1990-91 Gulf War might be supported by a misdirected regulatory drive. Here we use a detailed model of immune signaling in concert with an overarching circuit model of known sex and stress hormone co-regulation to explore how the failure of regulatory elements may further establish a self-perpetuating imbalance that closely resembles Gulf War Illness (GWI). Defects to the model were imparted iteratively and the stable regulatory modes supported by these altered immune-endocrine circuits were identified using repeated simulation experiments. In each case the predicted homeostatic regimes were compared to experimental data collected in male GWI (n=20 ) and matched healthy veterans (n=22 ). We found that alignment of GWI with a new homeostatic regime improved significantly when cortisol's normal anti-inflammatory activity was interrupted. Alignment improved further when this cortisol insensitivity was compounded by the loss of the normal antagonistic effects of Th1 cytokines on Th2 lymphocyte activation. Together these simulation results suggest altered glucocorticoid gene regulation compounded by possible changes in IGF-1 regulation of Th1:Th2 immune balance may be key underlying features of GWI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".