Concepto vs realidad: la aparente inclusión de los pueblos originarios en las novelas históricas de Saer, Iparraguirre y Brizuela
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article questions the so-called democratic aspect of the contemporary Latin American historical novel by analyzing three works published after the fall of the dictatorship in Argentina: El entenado (1983) by Juan Jose Saer, La tierra del fuego (1998) by Sylvia Iparraguirre, and El placer de la cautiva (2000) by Leopoldo Brizuela. Although all three novels examine and condemn exclusionary practices of history (and the national discourse), the democratic vision they project is nevertheless limited to those of European descent. The Amerindians in these novels, I argue, function merely as metaphors for ostracized sectors of society throughout the country’s history. Hence the authors fail to recognize the participation of Indigenous groups and their patrimony in the social fabric of contemporary Argentina. The democratic project extrapolated from these novels is limited, therefore, to a mere reorganization of traditional discourses that persistently exclude groups of non-European heritage from the national project
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".