MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2306365169 · doi:10.22037/jme.v7i2.840

The Relation Of Personal And Academic Characteristics Of Medical Students Cohort Entered The Medical Faculty Of Kermanshah University In 2000 And Their Performance In The 28th Comprehensive Exam Of Basic Medical Sciences

2009· article· en· W2306365169 on OpenAlexaff
Shirin Iranfar

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Microbiologists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical educationRelation (database)CohortPsychologyMedicineComputer scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><strong>Background and purpose</strong>: Considering the importance of comprehensive basic sciences exams in determining the academic level of medical students, this study was done to find the correlation between personal and academic characteristics of medical students entered the medical faculty of Kermanshah University in 1379 and the results of the 28 comprehensive basic medical sciences exam.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: 38 medical students participated in this study. An information form which includes personal and academic characteristics of medical students and their scores in the comprehensive basic medical sciences exams was used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (percent and average figures and inferential statistics variance analysis tests. test. Mann-Whitney and Ruska-Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Reults</strong>: 68.4% of the 38 medical students were male, 92.1% entered the university using target access schemes, 15.8% graduated from the high scrods for gifted and talented students, 63.2% has no failed units, 674% were living in dormitories. The average score on their diploma was 18.49±1.20 and the average of their total score in basic medical sciences stage was 14.89±10 I 0</p><p>The correlation (father comprehensive basic medical sciences exams with the average score in 5'h term or the average of total score in basic sciences stage was the most (0.8 and 0.79). there were no significant correlation between the scores in the comprehensive basic medical sciences exams and students' gender, place of living, target access schemes and graduation from school. for g feted and talented students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: this study showed that the average scores in different terms of basic medical science and the average of total scores in basic medical science stage are correlated with the scores in basic medical science stage.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Kermanshah, comprehensive basic medical sciences exam, medical students. Personal charaeterstics, academic characteristics.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207