Some synecological problems in the alpine zone of Garibaldi Park.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ecosystematic methods were used to study synecological problems in the Alpine Zone of Garibaldi Park, British Columbia. The influence of snow pack and its effects upon soils and the distribution of vegetation are considered. The successional trend of plant communities in the subalpine alpine ecotone and alpine zone is presented. The plant succession is closely related to environmental changes, particularly to the duration of the snow pack and soil forming processes. The Phyllodoceto - Cassiopetum mertensianae can be regarded as the zonal community in the Alpine Zone above 5,500 feet. It is shown that alpine zone ranges from 5,500 feet to the highest summits over 8,000 feet. Environmental conditions are correlated with units of vegetation which allow the recognition of twelve plant associations. The associations are arranged in groups which tend to characterize the habitats in which they are found. The associations are grouped as follows:- A. Snow patch group i) Gymnomitrieto - Polytrichetum norvegici a. sub-assoc. gymnomitrieto - polytrichetum norvegici b. sub-assoc. polytrichetosum piliferi ii) Cariceturn nigricantis iii) Sibbaldietum procumbentis B. Chomophytic group i) Caricetum spectabilis ii) Luetkeetum pectinatae iii) Anaphaleto - Lupinetum arctici C. Alpine meadow group i) Mimuleto - Epilobietum latifolii ii) Valerianetum sitchensis D. Rupicolous group i) Junipereto - Penstemonetum menziesii ii) Silenetum acaulis E. Alpine heather group i) Phyllodoceto - Cassiopetum mertensianae F. Krummholz group i) Abieteto - Chamaecyparetum nootkatensis G. Peat bog group i) Sphagnum
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".