Geriatric Assessment, Falls and Rehabilitation in Patients Starting or Established on Peritoneal Dialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals aged over 70 years at the time of starting dialysis have a varied and often challenging existence on dialysis. Canadian data suggest those starting dialysis between the ages of 75 and 79 years will have an average life expectancy of 3.2 years, while based on US data, patients can expect an average life expectancy of 25 months. A substantial proportion of these patients will, however, experience transient or permanent loss of personal independence within the first few months to years on dialysis. Preliminary data from patients recently started on peritoneal dialysis (PD) suggest patients and families adapt, but that the adaptation often involves limiting activities and altering the social role the patient has within the family. As data emerge, it will be possible to hypothesize whether this adaptation is beneficial in the long term, or whether these adaptations are permissive, allowing the patient to play a sick role leading to an accelerated transition to frailty and possibly death. Future research will hopefully inform us whether the functional dependency can be identified early and whether it is preventable. In the interim, repair rather than prevention is possible through rehabilitation. We therefore advocate that programs providing PD care consider the integration of protocols whereby patients may undergo formal evaluation to identify those who would benefit from walking or personal care aids, rehabilitation interventions, and, when needed, personal support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".