MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2307574059 · doi:10.14288/1.0055080

The place of vacuum forming in secondary sculpture and design programs

2010· article· en· W2307574059 on OpenAlex
Barry Willis Glen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Art, Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculptureCraftArchitectural engineeringVisual artsEngineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author contends that traditional methods and materials used to teach sculpture and design at the secondary level need to be supplemented with materials and processes which are a part of every student's contemporary experience. The thermal vacuum forming of plastics is an industrial process easily adapted to fulfill many of the goals and learning outcomes of art education. In the first part of the thesis, two questions are posed: "what is sculpture?" and "what is taught as sculpture in the context of art education?" The author arrives at the answer to the first question through an analysis of two divergent views of modern sculpture contained in the writings of Herbert Read (1964) and Rosalind Krauss (1977). The writings of contemporary sculptors are also considered. To answer the second question, the author engages in a historical review of the place of sculpture and design in art education since 1850, with particular reference to three influential factors: the rather pragmatic nature of society's interests which are often more utilitarian than aesthetic; the rise of the arts and crafts movement during the l880's and the on-going confusion between art, crafts, and industrial art; and the profound influence of the Bauhaus on educational thought from the 1920's to the present. Innovation in sculpture and art education are discussed in terms of a phenomenon peculiar to our technological era: the rapid acceleration of change. The impact of new materials and techniques on the evolution of modern sculpture is analyzed in relation to four significant events: Picasso's invention of assemblage, the use of "ready mades" in art, constructivism, and the application of welding to sculpture. The author considers some of the ways in which artists have exploited the unique characteristics of plastics in their sculpture; characteristics such as optical properties, casting and thermoforming capabilities, and reinforced plastic's high strength combined with light weight. The use of vacuum formed plastics in the sign industry is described and illustrated. The second half of this thesis expands upon the role of vacuum forming in the secondary art program. Goals and learning outcomes for the teaching of sculpture and design are discussed, and the creative potential of vacuum forming is assessed in the light of this discussion. Later sections describe vacuum forming in detail, including mold making, forming processes, fastening and glueing procedures, and finishing. Photographs of student work are used extensively to illustrate these sections. Finally, practical considerations and the limitations of vacuum forming are dealt with. The appendix includes notes and technical data on plastics, safety procedures, and drawings and practical suggestions for constructing a "budget" vacuum form machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it