REPLY: PERMIAN–TRIASSIC MICROBIALITE AND DISSOLUTION SURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS ON THE GENESIS OF MARINE MICROBIALITES AND DISSOLUTION SURFACE ASSOCIATED WITH THE END-PERMIAN MASS EXTINCTION: NEW SECTIONS AND OBSERVATIONS FROM THE NANPANJIANG BASIN, SOUTH CHINA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We appreciate Kershaw et al.'s comment and continued interest in our Permian–Triassic research in the Nanpanjiang Basin. Kershaw et al. comment on aspects of our recent study that contradict results from the study of Collin et al. (2009). Specifically their comments center around two questions: (1) whether the truncation surface at the base of the Permian–Triassic microbialite shows evidence for subaerial exposure, and (2) whether data support the model of genesis of the microbialites by upwelling of anoxic, alkaline waters with elevated carbonate saturation from bacterial sulfate reduction (Kershaw et al. 1999, 2007, 2012). We note that our recent study is much broader in scope than the issues addressed in this comment and reply. Our study presented extensive stratigraphic, geochemical, biostratigraphic and petrographic analyses from multiple sections, introduced new sections that have not been presented in the literature, and evaluated multiple models for the genesis of the microbialite and underlying truncation surface. We welcome this opportunity to respond to Kershaw et al.'s comment and to further illuminate studies of the Permian–Triassic boundary in the Nanpanjiang Basin. ### Two Generations of Fibrous Cement Fringe? Maybe, But There is Still no Evidence for Pendant Geometry Kershaw et al. comment that there are two generations of bladed fringing cement adhered to grains and that only the second generation has a pendant geometry. Collin et al. (2009) made the same interpretation. From the photographs in Collin et al. (2009, fig. 5Aa–5Ab) and from our thin section observations, we interpreted this to be a single generation of fibrous cement fringe adhered to grains, with a faint zonation of clear-cloudy-clear alternation within the fringe, in which the cloudy zone contained a greater concentration of fluid inclusions (fig. 1A, 1B). Note that the photos presented in the comment by Kershaw et al. (figs. 3, 4) are also consistent with this interpretation. The entire bladed cement fringe was used …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".