MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2308763102 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-03/2/721

Sodium Hybrid Capacitor: A Next Generation Energy Storage System

2016· article· en· W2308763102 on OpenAlexaff
Ranjith Thangavel, K. Karthikeyan, Hyun Jun Choi, Hari Vignesh Ramasamy, Gyung Hwan Lee, Xueliang Sun, Yun‐Sung Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower densityEnergy storageCapacitorMaterials scienceSodiumElectrolyteLithium (medication)Chemical engineeringPower (physics)ChemistryThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringElectrodeVoltagePhysical chemistryPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium ion batteries are emerging candidate for next generation high energy application including electrical vehicles and grid storage.[1] Rather than the similar working principle, the wide availability and low cost of sodium made them a suitable and an interesting candidate for large energy applications. The research for sodium ion batteries is majorly on improving their poor kinetics due to their large ionic radii resulting in low energy and power density.[2]The possible solution could be designing a hybrid capacitor which greatly improves the energy density and power density simultaneously because of their fast kinetics. In this work, we have developed and fabricated a new high performing 3 V sodium hybrid capacitor (NHC) using NASICON structured Na3V2(PO4)3 – (NVP) and a carbon derived from bio resource in an organic electrolyte. Two reactions occurs simultaneously, (i) intecalaction / deintercalation of sodium ions in NVP which brings high energy density, (ii) adsorption/ desorption of anion in the bio carbon giving high power density. An energy density of 118 Wh kg−1 has been achieved at a specific power of 95 W kg−1, retaining 60 Wh kg−1 of energy at high specific power of 850 W kg−1. A superior and an extremly outstanding stability of 95% is achieved after 10,000 cycles. The obtained results are one of the highest ever reported and it outperforms the present lithium hybrid capacitor by all means (energy density, power density, stability). The results will be presented and discussed in detail. References: 1) N. Yabuuchi,M. Kajiyama, J. Iwatate, H. Nishikawa, S. Hitomi, R. Okuyama, R. Usui, Y. Yamada, S. Komaba, Nat.Mater. 2012, 11, 512. 2) V. Etacheri, R. Marom, R. Elazari, G. Salitra, D. Aurbach, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207