Mineral Chemistry of Chlorite Replacing Biotite from Granitic Rocks of the Canadian Appalachians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chlorite flakes, as a product of alteration of biotite, the dominant ferromagnesian mineral in the Paleozoic granitic rocks of the Canadian Appalachians, have been analyzed by electron microprobe for major elements and by 57Fe M?ssbauer spectroscopy for the coordination and oxidation state of Fe. Comparison of M?ssbauer Fe3+/Fe ratios obtained from chlorite and its host biotite indicates that chloritization might have occurred under relatively oxidizing conditions. Based on 54 analyzed samples, Si cation totals of these sheet silicates are less than 6.25 atoms per formula unit (apfu), and the sum of octahedral cations is very close to 12 both an indication of trioctahedral chlorite. The calculated mole fraction of chlorite in interlayered phase, Xc, ranges from. 0.72 to 0.98 confirming that the chlorites are completely free of any smectite layers. Compositional variations in chlorite are strongly controlled by host biotite and rock type. Fe/(Fe+Mg) ratio ranges from 0.35 to 0.93 and Si contents from 5.18 to 6.11 apfu lead to the classification of chlorites mainly as ripidolite and brunsvigite. All major elements in the chlorite are strongly correlated with each other. Fe/(Fe+Mg) ratio in biotite is well preserved by chlorite. Chlorite thermometry based on the variation in tetrahedral Al content within the chlorite structure shows a large variation in temperatures from 200 to 390 °C with an average of 340 °C. The chlorite from igneous rocks could also be used to detect reheating events and reveal the thermal history of the rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".