MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2308990644 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-02/21/1230

Capturing the Morphology of the Micro-Porous Layer Using a Stochastic Approach

2014· article· en· W2308990644 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohamed El Hannach, Randhir Singh, Ned Djilali, Erik Kjeang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorosityMaterials scienceLayer (electronics)Thermal diffusivitySubstrate (aquarium)Economies of agglomerationComponent (thermodynamics)Work (physics)DiffusionNanotechnologyComposite materialChemical engineeringMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of low-temperature fuel cell technologies is strongly dependent on the effective transport properties of its porous sub-component materials. Properties such as gas diffusivity and thermal conductivity play an important yet complex role in determining whether the component will have a positive or a negative impact on the fuel cell performance. The micro-porous layer (MPL) is an intermediate component between the macro-porous gas diffusion layer (GDL) substrate and the catalyst layer. It is mainly made from carbon particles and hydrophobic agents such as PTFE. Various studies show that the MPL can mitigate catalyst layer flooding at high current densities and ensure a smooth transition between the large pores in the GDL substrate and the small ones in the catalyst layer. However, there is very limited information about MPL properties in the literature due to the complexity of measuring MPL-specific properties experimentally, considering that its delicate stricture always requires a supporting material. Numerical simulation is one of the most promising alternatives to systematically characterize the MPL and its effective transport properties. We have previously established and validated a numerical framework for the GDL 1 . In this work, we propose a stochastic method to generate the physical structure of the MPL material. The model utilizes material specifications such as porosity, size of the particles and PTFE loading as input for structure generation. The model also incorporates parameters to recreate the morphology of an actual structure, such as the clustering and the agglomeration of the particles and the location of the PTFE. This novel technique allows generating a realistic porous media that is validated against experimental data. The results show very good agreement with the measured pore size distribution of a standard MPL material sample. The validated 3D structure is then used to compute the effective transport properties 2 that are also in good agreement with the limited data available in the literature 3 . The model is subsequently applied to investigate the effect of certain parameters on the structure and thus on the effective properties. The results of the study provide some insight on how the MPL manufacturing process and particle size can be tuned for specific target properties. Overall, the stochastic modeling framework is intended to become a useful design tool for simulation and design of next generation MPL materials. Acknowledgments: This research was supported by Ballard Power Systems and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through an Automotive Partnership Canada (APC) grant. We highly appreciate the support form Professor Ned Djilali’s group at the University of Victoria. This research made use of computing resources provided by WestGrid and Compute/Calcul Canada. References: 1. M. El Hannach, and E. Kjeang, J. Electrochem. Soc., under review 2. K. J. Lange, P.-C. Sui, and N. Djilali, Commun. Comput. Phys. , 14 , 537–573 (2013). 3. A. Nanjundappa, A. S. Alavijeh, M. El Hannach, D. Harvey, and E. Kjeang, Electrochim. Acta 110 (2013) 349-357.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207