A prospective randomised trial of adjuvant vinorelbine (VIN) and cisplatin (CIS) in completely resected stage 1B and II non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Intergroup JBR.10
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7018 Background: In meta-analyses platinum based adjuvant chemotherapy using 2nd generation regimens increased cure rate by 5% in completely resected NSCLC. JBR.10 was undertaken to determine whether the 3rd generation regimen VIN/CIS prolonged survival in this clinical setting. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage 1 (T2N0) or stage 2 (excluding T3N0) NSCLC were stratified by nodal status (N0 vs. N1) and ras mutation status (present vs. absent vs. unknown) and randomised to receive 4 cycles of VIN (25mg/m2 weekly x 16 weeks) plus CIS (50mg/m2 days 1 and 8 q 4 weeks x 4) or follow up alone; VIN dose was reduced from 30mg/m2 shortly after the study started due to unacceptable toxicity. The endpoints of the study were survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), quality of life (QOL) and toxicity. Results: 482 patients were randomized between 1994 and 2001. Patients: age 61 years, 65% male, 51% PS 1, 53% N1, 24% ras mutation present. 45% of patients had T2N0, 40% T2N1 and 15% T1N1. 53% had adenocarcinoma. Grade 4 neutropenia, was common with febrile neutropenia in 7%, predominantly in patients receiving VIN 30mg/m2. The commonest non-hematologic toxicities for VIN/CIS patients were fatigue (77%), nausea (76%), anorexia (53%), vomiting (46%), sensory neuropathy (45%) and constipation (44%). Two patients died of drug-related toxicity [1 febrile neutropenia, 1 pulmonary fibrosis]. The most common cause of death was NSCLC (including 1 patient with 2nd primary NSCLC), while 3 patients died from toxicity related to later anti-cancer therapy, 9 patients died of other primary malignancies, and 21 from other causes. Overall survival was significantly prolonged for VIN/CIS patients (94 months vs. 73 months; HR 0.69, p=0.011), as was RFS (not reached vs. 46.7 months; HR 0.6, p 0.0003). 5-year survival for VIN/CIS patients was 69% compared to 54% for patients followed expectantly. 38 patients developed 2nd malignancies. Conclusions: This is the first randomized clinical trial demonstrating that a 3rd generation platinum-based doublet prolongs OS and RFS after surgery in early stage NSCLC. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration GlaxoSmithKline
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".