Influence of 1,2‐polybutadiene on properties of dicumyl peroxide cured brominated butyl rubber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Peroxide curing of brominated butyl rubber (BIIR) is an attractive topic, but the degradation of BIIR during the curing is a drawback needed to be overcome. Coagent assisted peroxide curing system is an attractive and effective choice in order to increase the crosslink density of rubbers. 1,2‐polybutadiene (1,2‐PB) is used as a crosslinking coagent for the curing of BIIR by dicumyl peroxide (DCP), and the effect of 1,2‐PB on the curing characteristics, crosslink density, and mechanical properties is investigated. The addition of 1,2‐PB affects the curing characteristics of BIIR compound and significantly increases the crosslink density of BIIR vulcanizates. With increasing 1,2‐PB content, the tensile strength and stresses at a given extension of BIIR vulcanizates increase, but the elongation at break decreases. A stress‐softening effect of the carbon black filled BIIR vulcanizates is observed and becomes more pronounced with increasing 1,2‐PB content. The addition of 1,2‐PB increases the stress relaxation index of BIIR. GPC and 13 C‐NMR results indicate 1,2‐PB participates in the crosslinking reaction, and the existence of 1,2‐PB component in the insoluble fraction of BIIR/1,2‐PB vulcanizates is confirmed by solid‐state 13 C‐NMR. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133 , 43280.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".