MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2309893464 · doi:10.1136/vetreccr-2016-000299

Osteomyelitis and fracture callus abscessation secondary to a foreign body reaction in a traumatic open fracture of the zygomatic bone of a puppy

2016· article· en· W2309893464 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Delisser, Chris Warren‐Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineZygomatic archSurgeryOsteomyelitisGranulation tissueImpactionZygomatic boneSoft tissuePuppyForeign bodyAnatomyWound healing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A five‐month‐old male labrador retriever presented with a large (6×3×5 cm) firm swelling associated with the right zygomatic arch. The dog suffered a bite wound two months previously, causing puncture wounds dorsal to the orbit where radiographs demonstrated a minimally displaced fracture of the zygomatic arch and surrounding soft, fluctuant swelling. Following three to four weeks of conservative management, the swelling had partially ossified. CT of the skull demonstrated a large cavitary osseous lesion of the right zygomatic arch associated with the previous fracture site. A lateral approach was used to perform marginal excision of the mass, preserving the eye. Histopathology of the mass revealed woven bone formation, granulation tissue lining the cavity and a fragment of plant material within the cavity. The recovery from surgery was unremarkable, and the dog did not suffer any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The dog was clinically normal at follow‐up 21 months post surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body InjuriesFrench-language works237,207