MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2310232926 · doi:10.82308/43729

Out-of-autoclave manufacturing of complex shaped composite laminates

2011· article· en· W2310232926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au QuébecMcGill University
KeywordsCompactionMaterials scienceComposite materialComposite laminatesAutoclaveShearing (physics)Composite numberShape factorGeometryMetallurgyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Out-of-Autoclave (OOA) manufacturing answers the growing need of the aerospace industry to process components of larger sizes at reduced costs. Recent prepreg materials have been developed specifically for OOA manufacturing and feature increased in-plane permeability through the presence of dry-fibre paths for efficient evacuation of gases. However, the differences in impregnation and resin kinetics attributed to OOA prepregs with respect to autoclave prepregs may affect the compaction behaviour in complex shape laminates. This thesis presents the results of an investigation of important design and processing parameters on the quality of complex shape laminates manufactured by OOA methods.L-shape composite laminates were manufactured by OOA methods, following the recommendations documented in the literature. The samples were tested for thickness variation at the corner and void content levels. The thickness variation at the corner was characterised based on the radius-to-thickness ratio for Cytec Cycom 5320 PW and 8HS prepregs with concave and convex tools. The experimental study showed increased corner thickening with decreasing radius-to-thickness ratio for both tool shapes. The data can be used to determine the minimal radius-to-thickness ratio for acceptable thickness variation for each material and serve as a design guideline. An analytical model of the compaction of L-shape laminates was developed. The discrepancies between the experimental data and the model predictions for thickness variation at the corner highlight the importance of shearing mechanisms in the compaction of L-shape laminates. Also, from the experimental investigation of various bagging arrangements, it is observed that the compaction at the corner is improved with the use of a pressure intensifier or pressure strip with proper corner radius. In addition, breather material should be placed under the pressure intensifier to allow efficient air removal and maintain a low void content level. A numerical analysis of the compaction of a laminate over a concave tool was performed and demonstrated that the material of the pressure intensifier or pressure strip should be of high stiffness for efficient laminate compaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it