Assessment of Interference of Growing Period of Amarant (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and Lambs Quarter (Chenopodium album) on Yield and its Components of Rapeseed
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to evaluate interference of different growth period weeds such as Amarant (Amaranthus roflexus L.)and Lambs Quarter (Chanopodium album) on cultivars of oilseed rape, a factorial based on randomized complete block design with three replication was conducted in Agricultural Experiments at station the Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch in 2008. The factors were three oilseed rape fall cultivars (SLM046, Opera, Okapi) and six controlling methods at different growth period (complete weed control, controlling weeds at 3-5 leaves, at 5-8 leaves, at the beginning flowering, at 50% flowering, and competition of weeds in all of the time). Analysis of data revealed that effect of interference weeds on height, number of pod, oil yield was significant at 1% level of probability and on number of grains per pod, 1000-grains weight and grain at 5% probability levels. The effect of oilseed rape cultivars on height, number of grains per pod, oil yield was significant at 1% probability levels and number of pod and weight of 1000-grain in 5% probability levels. The highest grain yield and oil yield were found to be 54% and 55%, respectively as compared with those of control. Also, grain yield was correlated with number of pod(r=0.886), weight of 1000-grain(r=0.513), number of grain in pod(r=0.783) significantly at 1% probability levels. In order to increase grain yield, control with SLM046, recommend to farmers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it