MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2311113336

Practical Idealism: social enterprise as work-integrated learning across the humanities

2012· article· en· W2311113336 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jock Macleod, Susanna Chamberlain

Bibliographic record

VenueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of South AfricaTshwane University of TechnologyUniversity of SurreyUniversity of WaterlooFlinders UniversityUniversity of New EnglandMurdoch UniversityMassey UniversityUniversity of JohannesburgCentral Queensland UniversityAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandAustralian Catholic UniversityUniversity of Western SydneyUniversity of Waikato
KeywordsIdealismBachelorLiberal arts educationDigital humanitiesPedagogySociologySuiteHumanitiesBridge (graph theory)EmployabilityThe artsWork (physics)Engineering ethicsHigher educationEngineeringPolitical scienceEpistemologyVisual artsArtPhilosophyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bachelor of Arts has traditionally provided a liberal education, emphasising the development of critical and other transportable skills in a range of humanities disciplines. One challenge for humanities educators in the twenty-first century is to find ways to bridge this tradition with the demand that graduates be prepared for the workplace. The School of Humanities at Griffith University has developed a suite of courses2 in its BA into which a work–integrated learning experience in social enterprise is embedded. The rationale for choosing social enterprises for WIL is the many opportunities they provide to articulate with the wide range of disciplines taught in a BA, and their capacity to resonate with the broad idealism of BA students. This paper offers an overview of the program since its inception in 2008, presents a reflection on the theoretical and pedagogical issues involved, and examines the impact of this innovation on the students. (Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 2012, 13(4), 195-206)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)Same topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207