Bibliographic record
Abstract
Question A 50 years old Male known with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis since October 2012 (Montreal Class E3) was seen for further follow up in gastroenterology outpatient. He was on Meselazine 2.4 gm per day. The last flare up he had was 2.5 years ago in April 2013 when he was treated successfully with a course of oral steroids. His colitis has been in a stable state with no further flare ups ever since. During his follow-up in Gastroenterology clinic in Sept 2015, he mentioned that he is opening his bowels 4-5/day with a consistency between watery to loose stool that was “normal” for him. He denied having significant bleeding or cramps. He also denied having a family history for colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps. Physical examination was unremarkable. Blood test revealed a normal CRP of 7, FBC, LFTs and U &E were also normal. Further colonoscopy surveillance were organised for assessment. What is the diagnosis? What is the prognosis and appropriate management? Figure 1 Colonoscopy; distal ascending colon. The colonoscopist reported that the ascending abnormalities caused stenosis but just enough open to pass the scope getting through to the Caecum Answer Giant Inflammatory Polyps (GIPs) in IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".